Keep care moving.
Replace repeated forms and calls between desks with a shared queue, orders and patient history.
Measure: OPD wait and discharge turnaroundGive patients a clearer journey, staff a connected workflow and management a traceable view of charges and collections — from arrival to discharge.
Start with one department. Measure the change.
Replace repeated forms and calls between desks with a shared queue, orders and patient history.
Measure: OPD wait and discharge turnaroundConnect services, tests, medicines and the inpatient stay to billing, then review what does not reconcile.
Measure: unbilled services and billing exceptionsKeep signed notes, dose records and changes together so staff can trace the work behind each encounter.
Measure: chart completeness and open deficienciesMost of your patients take this path. It has to feel smooth for the patient and be visible to management, from the same record.
Found by phone number, with no second file. A token and a printed receipt.
Duplicate warnings and one patient ID (UHID). The front desk's corrections show where time is lost.
“Did you know where to go and what would happen next?”
The waiting-room screen shows the token, and the queue moves in order.
Average recorded check-in-to-service wait by doctor and department, with sample counts.
“Could you get help when you needed it?”
Temperature, pulse and blood pressure taken once and not asked again.
Vitals saved to the visit record, so the doctor sees them before the patient walks in.
“Where nursing care was involved, did the nurse explain your care clearly?”
The history is already open, so the time goes to the conversation. The note is typed and signed.
Visits, no-shows and queue wait by doctor and department. A signed note is locked.
“Did the doctor listen and explain the plan clearly?”
A typed prescription the pharmacy can read. Test results arrive in the same record.
Dispensing and results recorded against the visit, with no slips to chase.
“Did you leave knowing the medicine and follow-up plan?”
A bill built from what was ordered, and a receipt the desk can explain.
Charges captured from the orders. Invoice exceptions and cash receipts by payment mode.
“Were the charges explained in a way you understood?”
A follow-up date is recorded. With portal access, the patient can send feedback and see the hospital's reply.
Feedback gets a reference and a response from the quality team. Next visit continues the same record.
“Did you leave knowing the medicine and follow-up plan?”
Proposed pilot questions, answered on a 1 to 5 scale with an optional comment. Collect a baseline first, repeat the same questions, and show the response count beside every result.
Proposed pilot questions for the owner, administrator, finance lead and department lead, asked separately at the start and at the review. Pair the answers with the scorecard measures below.
Satisfaction gains are pilot targets, not results. Feedback with a visible response is built; a validated satisfaction score is not. Patient feedback needs portal enrolment, so confirm how many patients can use it in your pilot.
Each scene shows the paper workflow, then the same handoff with PJ HMIS. Keep scrolling, or use the step-by-step journey.
A buying decision needs evidence from your hospital. Use the pilot to test financial control, patient flow, staff adoption and dependable operation.
Sample figures to show the layout; they are not results. In PJ HMIS the numbers come from the Financial, IPD and Operational reports for your hospital.
| Management’s question | What to demonstrate | Evidence to review |
|---|---|---|
| Are services reaching the bill? | Follow an eligible delivered service to its charge and invoice. Resolve a genuine missing charge. | Reviewed exceptions and charges actually collected. Distinguish package coverage, cancellations and approved free care. |
| Can we explain today’s money? | Reconcile invoices, collections, deposits and refunds with the cashier. Open the source records behind the totals. | A hospital-approved daily reconciliation. Deposits, billed revenue and collections remain separate. |
| What is delaying discharge? | Follow doctor and nursing clearance, the summary and final billing through one admission. | Time from discharge decision to departure and bed release, with the reason for each delay. |
| Will our staff use this? | Have reception, doctors, nurses, pharmacy and billing complete their own routine tasks. | Observed task completion, time spent, corrections and help needed. Capture what staff find difficult. |
| Can we switch with confidence? | Rehearse the agreed import, a usable data export, access checks and recovery procedure. | Signed import checks, named support contacts, escalation hours and witnessed recovery evidence. |
Follow the source records, the approval and the responsible person. Confirm the enabled modules and approval roles for your hospital.
Reconciliation supports review and collections follow-up. Actual recovered charges, avoided costs and liquidity changes must be measured against your baseline; these are not audited profit figures.
Start with the cautious case and replace every input with your own figures. These are illustrative inputs, not measured outcomes.
Recovered charges and bed revenue are not profit. The model excludes collection timing, extra care costs and one-off migration or training costs unless you include them in the annual cost. Avoid double counting, and confirm each input in the pilot before relying on the result.
Fill the baseline from your own records, set a target together, then read the same measure after the pilot.
| Measure | Where PJ HMIS shows it | Baseline | Pilot target | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unbilled services and billing exceptions | Invoice exceptions and the financial ledger reconciliation | |||
| Money billed, collected and outstanding | Cash receipts by payment mode and receivables ageing | |||
| Discharge turnaround, decision to departure | Discharge clearances and the IPD report | |||
| Bed turnover time | Bed board and housekeeping completion | |||
| OPD waiting time | OPD report: average recorded queue wait, with sample counts | |||
| Chart completeness and open deficiencies | Medical records completeness and deficiency list | |||
| Staff task completion and help needed | Observed in the pilot, role by role | |||
| Patient feedback received and answered | Portal feedback and quality complaints, with response counts |
Agree the annual subscription, setup, training, migration scope, support hours, storage and interface costs, renewal terms and data export arrangements in writing before purchase.
Review both the workflow and the patient’s experience: knowing what happens next, being heard, understanding the bill and leaving with a clear plan.
A shared registration record and visible queue can help staff explain where to go and what happens next.
Pilot review: actual waiting time, repeated registration questions and clarity of queue updates.History, orders and observations stay together so doctors and nurses have more context for the conversation.
Pilot review: whether patients felt listened to, received clear explanations and could get help when needed.Readable prescriptions and reviewed discharge documents support a conversation about medicines, follow-up and whom to contact.
Pilot review: patient understanding at discharge, documents received and follow-up instructions explained.Traceable service charges and receipts help the billing desk explain the bill and handle questions consistently.
Pilot review: billing questions, disputed charges, resolution time and the patient’s understanding of the bill.Keep patients informed beyond the reception desk, with access to released records and a way to follow a concern.
Patients submit feedback about waiting, communication, care, staff conduct or billing. The quality team records the investigation and resolution; the patient can see the status and hospital response in the portal.
Patients can view appointments, available records and released documents. They can invite a caregiver, choose the shared record categories, set an expiry and revoke access.
Feedback and hospital responses are implemented. The satisfaction questions below are a proposed pilot survey: use a baseline, repeat the same questions and report response counts before claiming an improvement.
Use a short hospital-run feedback check before and during the pilot. Ask at the same point in the journey and show the response count alongside the results.
Discuss feedback with the care team and patient-relations owner. Pair it with observed waits and handoff delays to choose the next improvement.
Proposed pilot questions, to be tailored by the hospital. Reference: AHRQ patient experience survey guidance. Review patient feedback and operational measures together, and evaluate changes against the pilot baseline.
Meet Ramesh, our sample patient. Compare the paper workflow with PJ HMIS, one step at a time.
Use ← → to move through the focused journey · Workflow illustrations, sample data
Demonstrate how medication records, urgent results and discharge handoffs connect the responsible teams.
Record critical-result communication, then the responsible care team’s acknowledgement and action taken. The handoff has a visible record for review.
Validate barcode devices, clinical rules and handoff policies with your team. The pilot must establish practical fit and outcomes; these checks do not establish a measured reduction in clinical errors.
Select a role to see available product evidence, the daily workflow and practical acceptance checks. Validate the proposed review measures with your team in the pilot.
Use the review to understand workload and improve handoffs. Interpret staff measures with patient complexity, shift length, staffing levels and documented clinical reasons. Patient volume or revenue alone does not establish quality of care. Agree timestamp definitions and confirm the available evidence before reporting a measure.
Workflow and usability review informed by AHRQ’s workflow assessment guidance.
Three editions share the same patient record. Add departments as the hospital is ready.
From appointment to receipt, with the complete visit in one place.
Start with the front desk and consulting room.
Everything in OPD, plus the inpatient journey from admission to discharge.
Pilot one ward, then expand with your team.
Extend Hospital Core with the departments and integrations in your agreed scope.
Integration readiness is verified per deployment.
Discuss your pilot →Before expanding, have your team complete routine tasks with the hospital’s devices, templates and support arrangements.
Use the reception computer, ward devices, network and printers. Rehearse a lost-connection procedure and reconcile entries made during downtime.
Check tariffs, packages, visit types, forms, printouts and explanations in languages the hospital uses. Confirm required steps and department-specific exceptions.
Train one representative from each role, then observe independent use on the intended shift. Record help needed, duplicate entry and interruptions to patient care.
Import only agreed records. Check patient identity and opening balances, test permissions by role and show a usable export with the hospital owner.
Agree support hours, urgent escalation, hospital and implementation owners, and a witnessed backup-and-recovery rehearsal for the pilot scope.
Test any in-scope pharmacy, lab, payer or device interface with its real counterpart. Include only accepted interfaces in the rollout commitment.
Staff can complete the scoped workflows, finance can reconcile the totals, patient feedback has been reviewed, and critical access, clinical and recovery issues are resolved. Agree the numerical targets and review date together.
Choose an OPD or one ward. Agree the scope, train the team and compare patient feedback, staff task completion and reconciled financial results with a baseline from your hospital.

Map one patient journey. Define the baseline, owners and success measures.
Configure roles, wards, tariffs and templates. Rehearse with sample cases.
Train each role and begin the agreed workflow with a named support owner.
Reconcile charges, check record completeness and review staff adoption before expansion.
Waiting and discharge experience, clarity of explanations and the bill, with feedback response counts.
Independent task completion, time and help needed, complete records and handoffs reviewed by each role.
Reconciled collections, reviewed charge exceptions and clearly assigned outstanding actions.
Usable devices and printouts, approved scope and cost, accepted access checks and rehearsed recovery.